Friday, March 30, 2012

Ignorance On Display

Some blogs simply write themselves, we just have to get out of the way and let them go.

Read this article.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Just Another Liberal D-bag

Spike Lee tweeted what he thought was the address of George Martin in Florida.

Let's pause right there.

He was asking people to go to this man's house and harass him. There are people putting a bounty on his head. We have the NBPP saying they are going to form a militia to go and get this man. (aside: why the Hell is a black militia okay when a white one is a hate group?).

In short, there are a bunch of whack-jobs out there who would like to harm this man. A man who could very well be guilty of nothing more than protecting himself from an assault.

So what does Spike Lee do? The liberal POS sends the shooters address out so these nuts can go and harm him.

Problem is, that's not even the punch line yet.

It turns out that it was the wrong address. It was the address of a couple in their 70's who have no connection what-so-ever to the case except the misfortune of having a son with a similar name who lived with them briefly more than a decade ago.

That is still not the worst of it.

These people are being harassed. They have the media hounding them. They have gotten hate mail. They have had to move out of their house for their safety.

But we are still not to the worst of it.

This POS liberal refuses to apologize to them. When contacted his staff offered a "no comment".

Spike Lee Won't Apologize, Has 'No Comment' On Terror Tweet

Read the article.

My only hope is these poor people sue this dude into bankruptcy.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Some Assaults Obama And Friends Have Yet To Comment On

President Barack Obama was concerned about the Traymont Martin shooting because the kid looked like him.

That must be why he has not shown much concern for these incidents.

Mississippi State releases more details on Saturday homicide

Notice this passage:

Three African American male suspects reportedly fled the scene in a blue Crown Victoria.

Read the article

This was clearly a racially motivated killing. One can only assume the good men Jackson and Sharpton will stop by Mississippi since they are already in the neighborhood.

Then there is this one in which the perpetrators made racial comments during the attack.

Teen Set on Fire in Racial Attack; Media Silent

Read the article.

Hmm, that one happened about a month ago. That's the same response time as Obama and friends had on the Florida shooting. They'll probably comment on it any day now.

Come to think of it, they didn't comment on this attack either

Race War At Wisconsin State Fair


or this one



But surely he has commented on this right?

Race and the 'flash mob' attacks


I mean, it's happening in his home town.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Obama Attempting To Walk Back Comments On Florida Shooting

"was speaking powerfully about this as a parent."..."no matter gender or race, this is a tragedy."

David Plouffe, White House adviser.

Read the article.

We have all heard about the shooting in Florida. While we have yet to hear any real evidence in the case, the shooter has been convicted by the court of public opinion and apparently sentenced to death by some in our society. Whatever else happens in the case, we still have a young man dead and family living the horror of any parent, the death of a child.

As he has been wont to do in other racially charged cases, President Obama quickly dove head first into the national discussion with what could easily be taken as a racially tinged statement.

The clear inference in his comment was that it was a tragedy because the kid looked like him. A comment that would have brought howls of protest from a white president. People would still be screaming if George Bush had made such a remark about a white teenager.

It seems as if Obama is now realizing that he may have made a mistake by misjudging how large the mob scene that is developing currently in Florida would become.

As with any case like this we have the Rev Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton rushing down to claim face time in front of any TV camera they can find. Truth, evidence, investigation all be damned. We don't need to know the truth, just give the man a fair trial and hang him.

Problem this time is someone slipped up and let the hard-core racists in. Now we have Louis Farrakhan and the New Black Panther Party in Florida forming a lynch mob.

We have Farrakhan calling for retaliation


Read the article.

Then we have the NBPP putting a bounty on the shooter's head and calling for the formation of a militia to hunt down the shooter and take matters into their own hands.

"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."..."If the government won't do the job, we'll do it."

Mikhail Muhammad, leader of the NBPP

Black Panthers offer $10,000 bounty to catch Trayvon killer

Read the article.

Bottom line is that Obama has once again, needlessly, put himself in a no-win situation with a racially-charged issue.

-If he backtracks now or condemns the NBPP and Farrakhan, as he should, he will get criticized from the left.

-If he does not criticize the NBPP and Farrakhan, which he should if he were to be fair, he will be attacked from the right as a racist and turning a blind eye to hatred from the left (again).

-Do nothing, as he pretty much is doing now, and the whole thing blows up in to a race-fueled frenzy and it is too late to do anything.

What is the solution? Elect a President (and by extension an Attorney General) that represents the entire country , not just one race.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Prefer Obama Over Romney - What Do You Think?

Rick Santorum has said if Mitt Romney is the nominee we might as well stick with Obama.

Read the article.

What do you think?

We have also had Newt Gingrich say he will stay in the campaign to try to derail Romney. Not to win, just to keep Romney from winning. His speech after the Mississippi and Alabama primaries bordered on delusional IMHO.

Like or don't like who we have as a choice this year, and I am not a huge fan of any of them, is this kind of rhetoric good for the GOP's prospects in the fall?

How could, for instance, Santorum or Gingrich now come out in the general election and throw their support (and supporters) behind Romney - the likely nominee?

Bottom line, they are writing campaign commercials for the Dems.

I wonder, and, as I said this is far from an endorsement, if it is time for Santorum and Gingrich to man up and step aside.

Gingrich was done when he started. His campaign has been a joke all along.

Santroum fought the good fight but, it's over. If he can't see this by now he's an idiot. He would have to get about 75% of the delegates from here out, in states where he is mostly trailing. There are some inspirational come-back stories, this isn't one of them.

Ron Paul, forget about it. He's quaint and a little crazy but completely irrelevant. He's hanging out until the end to give his supporters a voice at the convention. I'm not opposed to this. I actually respect it. And yes, it is different than trying to undermine the front runner like Newt is doing.

Forget a brokered convention. At best this would be disastrous for the GOP. What kind of dumb-asses do we look like to the swing voters if we cannot even choose a nominee? That inspires trust.

Also, who would be the nominee? Think Romney's supporters are going to be rabid supporters of a candidate that did not get any votes in the primary and was chosen instead by the party bosses? Should they be?

Think Romney is going to quietly go away if he has 85 - 90% of the delegates needed when no one else generated 40 - 50%? Should he?

The question for these gentleman becomes, which is more important - their country and party or their ego.

What are your thoughts?

Sunday, March 18, 2012

"We made a decision to postpone publishing it in light of recent events in Afghanistan, including the Koran burning and the alleged killings of Afghani civilians by a member of the U.S. military. It is our belief that fallout from running this ad now could put US troops and civilians in the region in danger and we would like to avoid that."

Eileen Murphy, New York Times

Read the article

For those of you who have been in a cave and have not heard of this, the NYT ran the following anti-Catholic ad from the Freedom From Religion Foundation in the paper on March 9th.

In response Pamela Geller, blogger and executive director of Stop Islamization of America, asked the NYT to run this ad

Hmm. Think the NYT is really worried about placing US troops in danger?

Bank Data Is Sifted by U.S. in Secret to Block Terror

Leaked Cables Offer Raw Look at U.S. Diplomacy

The Iraq Archive: The Strands of a War

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

The NAACP Wants ... Saudi Arabia To Investigate Our Voting Rights Record?

UN rights council delves into US voter I.D. laws

Read the article.

The make-up of the council who will judge us:

-China and Cuba, both known for their stellar human rights record

-Kuwait, allowed women to vote starting in 2005

-Qatar, women could vote starting in 2003

-Moldova, one of the pioneers. They have allowed women to vote for almost 20 years.

-Saudi Arabia, as of yet does not allow women to vote. Or drive. Or sunbathe.

What is the point? The point is that the NAACP, like the rest of the left, is willing to whore themselves out to make a political point.

What we need is for someone to have the stones to take the 2008 Black Panther's incident in Philadelphia. But then, the left would not see that as racism, it's against whitey.

The question is, what will Obama do if the UN council finds that we violate the rights of blacks?

The finding itself is irrelevant. It has no bearing onus and is from a council with no credibility what-so-ever.

But... will Obama and the "Justice Department" use this as ammunition against states trying to pass voter ID laws? Laws that have been deemed constitutional by SCOTUS, which obviously has no bearing with the left.

Addendum. Immediately after I posted this I went to and saw this article. Muammar Qaddafi and Libya are being praised for their human rights record by the same UN Human Rights Council that will investigate us.

What is there left to say?

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Rush Has Company

There was a great article by Kirsten Powers published Sunday.

For those who do not know Ms Powers, she is a columnist, former member of Bill Clinton's staff, and Fox News contributer.

I see her as a fairly frequent guest on Special Report with Bret Baier. I like her although I don't very often agree with her because of her views. Bottom line? She's a consistent, strong willed liberal.

This introduction is important to know before you read this article. It is important to understand where she is coming from when she is writing this.

Rush Limbaugh Isn’t the Only Media Misogynist

Mar 4, 2012 10:00 AM EST

Rush Limbaugh apologized on Saturday for calling a Georgetown Law student a slut for testifying about contraception and starting a firestorm of outrage. Kirsten Powers says the liberals who led the charge need to start holding their own side accountable.

Read the article, it's well worth your time.

As a bonus, read this. It asks the question "Will Obama return the $1 million he got from Maher's PAC"?

Finally, when you are done, pass this on.

We are small bloggers with no real power but as a group we can make change.

Write your own piece, if you see fit.

It is time we bring the left kicking and screaming into the light of day. Time to put them on display for the misogynist, racist, hateful people they really are.

The media is not going to do it for us.

Friday, March 2, 2012

What Do You Think About This?

Medical Journal Advocates Killing Newborns

Read the article

This seems like a dumb question but what are your thoughts on this?

I have a thought on it that may surprise a bit but I want to see what other people think.

Thursday, March 1, 2012




Read the article.

This is why the left hates any media that is not the nets, CNN, MSNBC, Associated Press, Reuters, well - you get the point.

It appears the Chairwoman of the DNC "Baghdad" Debbie Wasserman Schultz was going to be the keynote speaker at an organization headed by a man on the US' terrorist watch list. Schultz, who is Jewish, was scheduled to speak at a fundraiser.

As always happens when a lib gets caught by the non-MSM, she passed it off as a misunderstanding. Seems like quite a misunderstanding to me.

Bottom line, there is no moral compass on the left. Their only goal is to re-elect Obama. To hell with the US. No matter who they have to get in bed with to win.

Any questions?